Israeli strike in Gaza humanitarian zone kills 19, Hamas-run health ministry says

Reuters A girl is given an oral polio vaccine in Jabalia, in northern Gaza Strip (10 September 2024)Reuters

An estimated 1.9 million people – more than 80% of the population – are estimated to have been displaced by the war, and some have had to flee as many as 10 times.

UN agencies and their partners are currently trying to stop the spread of polio in the overcrowded camps with poor sanitation where many of them are living.

The World Health Organization said the third phase of its vaccination campaign began in northern Gaza on Tuesday, after 446,000 children were inoculated in the centre and south earlier this month during localised pauses in the fighting agreed by Israel and Hamas.

On Monday, a team of 12 UN staff members on their way to the north to support the campaign was stopped by Israeli troops at a checkpoint for more than seven hours, according to UN Humanitarian Co-ordinator Muhannad Hadi.

“While at the checkpoint the team was informed that the IDF wanted to hold two of the UN staff members in the convoy for further questioning,” he said.

“The situation escalated quickly, with soldiers pointing their weapons directly towards the convoy personnel. Live shots were fired, and tanks and bulldozers approached, engaged with, and damaged UN vehicles, endangering the lives of UN staff inside the vehicles.”

The two staff were eventually questioned and then released following the intervention of senior UN officials to de-escalate the situation, he added.

The IDF said its forces had intelligence that a number of Palestinian suspects were present in the convoy, and that they delayed the convoy in order to question them.

Additional reporting by Thomas Mackintosh in London

UK halts all Iran flights as allies step up sanctions

The UK, France and Germany have announced fresh sanctions on Iran for supplying Russia with ballistic missiles for use in Ukraine, including restrictions on Iran Air’s ability to fly to the UK and Europe.

Also among the new measures, which have been announced as US Secretary of State Antony Blinken visits London, are travel bans on a number of Iranian military officials.

Mr Blinken said Russians had been trained by Iranian forces to use short-range missiles and they could be deployed against Ukrainians within weeks.

His host, UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy, said the Iranian deliveries marked a “dangerous escalation” which had allowed Russia to “fuel its illegal invasion of Ukraine”.

“Iran must stop supporting [Russian President Vladimir] Putin’s unprovoked, premeditated and barbaric attack against a sovereign democratic state,” Mr Lammy said. “The UK will stand with Ukraine for as long as it takes.”

Speaking earlier, alongside Mr Lammy at a news conference in London, Mr Blinken said Russian President Vladimir Putin was “increasingly relying on support” for Iran and North Korea to help “wage his war of aggression on Ukraine”.

The UK Foreign Office announced specific sanctions against several key individuals it said were heavily involved in the missiles supplies, including Iranian Brig Gen Seyed Hamzeh Ghalandari who commands the country’s exports of defence products to its partners. He has been placed under a travel ban and asset freeze, alongside two other Iranian officials.

Five Russian cargo ships have also been sanctioned for transporting the military supplies from Iran, despite what the UK said were repeated warnings not to do so.

Meanwhile, several organisations, including some allegedly involved in the production of Iran’s kamikaze-style Shahed drones – which Russia has used consistently in attacks on Ukrainian cities – have been sanctioned.

In a statement, the UK, France and Germany – known as the E3 – called on Iran “to immediately cease all support to Russia’s war against Ukraine and halt the development and transfers of its ballistic missiles”.

They added that Iran’s supply of missiles represented a “a direct threat to European security”.

Mr Blinken echoed the E3 statement, saying that the move “demonstrates how Iran’s destabilising influence stretches long beyond the Middle East”.

The Western sanctions come as Russia has continued to make gains in eastern Ukraine, with Moscow’s forces rapidly approaching the key settlement of Pokrovsk.

Pokrovsk is an essential transportation hub. If it falls, then Russian forces will cut off one of the main supply routes in the region. This will likely force Ukraine to retreat from Chasiv Yar and the front line will move closer to Kramatorsk, a major industrial city.

The Iranian short range missile deliveries will aid the Russian advance, Mr Blinken said, by allowing Moscow to use more of its existing arsenal for targets that are further from the frontline, while reserving the new missiles for closer range targets.

The top US diplomat hit out at the new Iranian government, led by President Masoud Pezeshkian, who is said to desire a less adversarial relationship with the West.

“Iran’s new president and foreign minister have repeatedly said that they want to restore engagement with Europe. They want to receive sanctions relief. Destabilising actions like these will achieve exactly the opposite,” he said.

Mr Blinken and Mr Lammy also announced a joint trip to Ukraine this week, the first joint trip in years as UK diplomats seek to frame the secretary of state’s visit as a reaffirmation of a close partnership between the two countries, often described as the “special relationship”.

Mr Blinken said one of their goals ahead of the visit was to “hear directly from the Ukrainian leadership” about their “objectives and what we can do to support those needs”.

UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has made clear the UK government will continue to back Ukraine and send £3bn in military support to the country for as long as needed.

Last week, the UK government said it was sending hundreds more short-range missiles to Ukraine in a package worth £162m.

But Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has criticised the pace of weapons deliveries, and asked for authorisation to strike targets deep inside Russia with Western-supplied missiles – a move the US has thus far resisted.

Mr Blinken would not be drawn on what their answer will be this time to President Zelensky’s longstanding plea during talks in Kyiv.

Harris and Trump to debate in pivotal campaign test

Presidential debates matter in American politics. And the one that takes place on Tuesday night between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris – their only currently scheduled face-off – may matter more than most.

Joe Biden’s poor performance in the first presidential debate in late June created a firestorm of pressure within the Democratic Party that ultimately forced him to abandon his re-election campaign.

Even though Kamala Harris has been vice-president for more than three years and a candidate for president for seven weeks, she is still a relative unknown for many Americans. In a recent New York Times survey, 28% of likely November voters said that they needed to know more about the Californian.

That poll showed the race a statistical dead heat – a finding most recent surveys have also indicated, both nationally and in key battleground states. The 2024 presidential campaign has been full of historic tumult, but the American electorate is still sharply – and narrowly – divided.

That underscores the importance of Tuesday night’s debate, where even small shifts in the mood of the electorate could be the difference between victory and defeat for the candidates.

For Ms Harris, the showdown in Philadelphia provides an opportunity for her to flesh out the details before an audience of tens of millions – although she will have to do so while under rhetorical fire from her Republican opponent.

This opportunity is not without risks, however, as Ms Harris could define herself – and her positions – in ways that damage her electoral prospects. She has struggled in the past with answering pointed questions under pressure, and her reluctance to sit for media interviews in the opening weeks of her campaign has denied her the opportunity to hone her linguistic chops.

Although she has tried to present herself as the change candidate in this election, the moderators – and the former president – are likely to press her to defend the Biden administration’s record, particularly on areas where polls show Democrats are weak, such as border security and inflation.

She will also have to explain why she has renounced some of the more liberal policies she embraced during her unsuccessful bid for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination. She recently has walked back her positions on a fracking ban, decriminalising border crossing and nationalising health insurance, among others.

She has explained these changes as ones made to reflect new circumstances – but they may be viewed by some voters as moves born of political expediency.

For Trump, the debate presents an opportunity to wrest back the initiative in this campaign after a month where the Democrats – with their new nominee and high-energy convention – dominated political headlines. He has a history of thriving in the spotlight and setting the terms of political conversation that keeps his opponents off-balance and his issues – notably on immigration and trade, where his positions have broad popular support – at the forefront of political discussion.

The former president has his own potential pitfalls on Tuesday, however. His uneven performance during his June debate with Mr Biden drew little scrutiny because of his opponent’s sometimes catastrophic verbal miscues. Ms Harris is sure to present a more nimble opponent, and his answers will have to be sharper.

During a New York economic forum last week, he was unable to offer a clear explanation for his childcare policies. Such verbal meandering during the debate will provide Democrats with a wealth of campaign fodder.

Trump must also tread carefully when sparring with the vice-president – only the second woman presidential nominee and the first of colour. If he comes across as domineering or belittling, he could further damage his already weak support among female voters.

The two candidates have used markedly different ways of preparing for Tuesday night’s event. The vice-president – and former prosecutor – has been in Pittsburgh, a few hours’ drive west of Philadelphia, holding mock debates and reviewing her policy proposals. The move also allowed her to campaign and benefit from some local media coverage in the largest and most crucial battleground state of Pennsylvania.

Trump – who has participated in presidential debates in each of the past three elections – has held more informal sessions, including reviewing his positions on key issues. Last week, he participated in a town hall forum hosted by conservative cable network Fox News.

Tuesday, then, is set to be a contrast of styles as well as political views.

Although election day won’t arrive until November, early voting is set to begin this month in some key battleground states – including in pivotal Pennsylvania.

So while this debate could help set the political environment for the last two months of the 2024 presidential race, it also will be the last chance for the two candidates to reach some voters in states where every ballot matters.

Newsletter image

North America correspondent Anthony Zurcher makes sense of the race for the White House in his weekly US Election Unspun newsletter. Readers in the UK can sign up here. Those outside the UK can sign up here.

Israeli strike in Gaza humanitarian zone kills 19, Hamas-run health ministry says

At least 19 people have been killed in an overnight Israeli strike in the designated humanitarian zone in southern Gaza, the Hamas-run health ministry says.

Witnesses said the strike obliterated an area crowded with tents for displaced Palestinians in al-Mawasi, south-west of Khan Younis, leaving huge craters in the sand.

“The bombing was incredibly intense. People were thrown into the air,” one displaced man told the BBC. “You can’t imagine the devastation.”

The Israeli military said its aircraft attacked what it called “a number of senior Hamas terrorists” operating there – a claim Hamas denied.

The military also disputed the initial death toll put out by the Hamas-run Civil Defence authority, which reported that rescue teams had recovered more than 40 bodies.

Hundreds of thousands of people from other areas of Gaza are living in dire conditions in al-Mawasi after being told by Israel to evacuate there for their own safety.

The UN says the humanitarian zone spans only 41 sq km (16 sq miles) and lacks critical infrastructure and basic services, while aid provision is limited due to access and security issues.

Eyewitnesses said large explosions rocked al-Mawasi shortly after midnight local time on Tuesday (21:00 GMT on Monday).

Khaled Mahmoud, a volunteer for a charity who lives near the site of the strike, told the BBC that he and other volunteers rushed to help but were stunned by the scale of the destruction.

“The strikes created three craters 7m [23ft] deep and buried more than 20 tents,” he said.

Aya Madi, a displaced mother of seven from the southern city of Rafah, later told a freelance journalist working for the BBC: “We woke up to nothing but sand and fire.

“My children were screaming, and the tent collapsed on them. I pulled them out from under the rubble.

“I held my two-month-old son, thinking he was dead, covered in sand, barely breathing. I washed him and thanked God he was still alive.”

She said all of those killed were civilians, adding that there was “not a single resistance fighter”.

“All that remains is dust and ashes,” she added. “Some of [the casualties] were torn in parts, other they had to dig to find, some were found in people’s houses… The scene is terrifying.”

Another woman, Aisha Nafi al-Shaeri, said: “It was all tents of displaced people. And now everything is destroyed.”

“They told people to stay here, but there is no safe area. Those people had nothing, and they were sleeping.”

“They didn’t warn anyone. Everyone was sleeping, and suddenly they started shelling.”

The Civil Defence’s operations director said overnight that more than 40 people were killed and more than 60 others were injured.

Later on Monday, an official at the nearby Nasser hospital in Khan Younis told the BBC that 13 people killed in the strike had been brought there.

In the afternoon, the Hamas-run health ministry said in a statement that hospitals had received a total of 19 bodies and more than 60 wounded people, some of whom were in a serious condition. It did not say how many were men, women or children.

Rescuers were unable to reach a number of other victims still buried under sand and rubble, or on roads, the ministry added.

In a statement, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said aircraft had conducted “a precise strike on a number of senior Hamas terrorists who were operating within a command and control centre embedded inside the humanitarian area”.

They included Samer Abu Daqqa, head of Hamas’s aerial unit, and Osama Tabesh, head of the observation and targets department in Hamas’s military intelligence headquarters, it added.

“Prior to the strike, extensive intelligence gathering was conducted, as well as continuous aerial surveillance in the hours leading up to the strike, which confirmed the presence of the terrorists in the area alongside additional terrorist operatives,” it said, adding that casualty numbers put out by Hamas-run authorities did “not align” with its information.

The IDF accused Hamas of embedding its operatives and military infrastructure in the humanitarian zone and using civilians as human shields.

A Hamas statement denounced the strike on al-Mawasi as a “heinous massacre” and rejected the IDF’s claim that it had a command centre there.

“This is a clear lie that aims to justify these ugly crimes. The resistance has denied several times that any of its members exist within civilian gatherings or use these places for military purposes,” it said.

UN Middle East peace envoy Tor Wennesland condemned the strike on a densely-populated area where displaced people were sheltering.

“I underline that international humanitarian law, including the principles of distinction, proportionality, and precautions in attack, must be upheld at all times,” he said. “I also emphasize that civilians must never be used as human shields.”

He also urged Israel and Hamas to immediately agree a deal that would for a ceasefire and the release of the remaining hostages in Gaza.

The Israeli military launched a campaign to destroy Hamas in response to the group’s unprecedented attack on southern Israel on 7 October, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were taken back to Gaza as hostages.

More than 40,980 people have been killed in Gaza since then, according to the territory’s Hamas-run health ministry.

An estimated 1.9 million people – more than 80% of the population – are estimated to have been displaced by the war, and some have had to flee as many as 10 times.

Iran sanctioned for sending missiles to Russia

The UK, France and Germany have announced fresh sanctions on Iran for supplying Russia with ballistic missiles for use in Ukraine.

Among the new measures, which have been announced as US Secretary of State Antony Blinken visits London, are restrictions on Iran Air’s ability to fly to the UK and Europe.

Mr Blinken said Russians had been trained by Iranians to use short-range missiles and they could be deployed against Ukrainians within weeks.

His host, UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy, said the Iranian deliveries marked a “dangerous escalation” which had allowed Russia to “fuel its illegal invasion of Ukraine”.

“Iran must stop supporting [Russian President Vladimir] Putin’s unprovoked, premeditated and barbaric attack against a sovereign democratic state,” Mr Lammy added. “The UK will stand with Ukraine for as long as it takes.”

Speaking earlier, alongside Mr Lammy at a news conference in London, Mr Blinken said Russian President Vladimir Putin was “increasingly relying on support” for Iran and North Korea to help “wage his war of aggression on Ukraine”.

The UK Foreign Office also announced specific sanctions against several key individuals it said were heavily involved in the missiles supplies, including Iranian Brig Gen Seyed Hamzeh Ghalandari who commands the country’s exports of defence products to its partners. He has been placed under a travel ban and asset freeze, alongside two other Iranian officials.

Five Russian cargo ships have also been sanctioned, for transporting the military supplies from Iran, despite what the UK said were repeated warnings not to do so.

Meanwhile, several organisations, including some allegedly involved in the production of the Shahed drones – which Russia has used consistently in attacks on Ukrainian cities – have been sanctioned.

In a statement, the UK, France and Germany – known as the E3 – called on Iran “to immediately cease all support to Russia’s war against Ukraine and halt the development and transfers of its ballistic missiles”.

They added that Iran’s supply of missiles represented a “a direct threat to European security”.

Mr Blinken echoed the E3 statement, saying that the move “demonstrates how Iran’s destabilising influence stretches long beyond the Middle East”.

The Western sanctions come as Russia has continued to make gains in eastern Ukraine, with Moscow’s forces rapidly approaching the key settlement of Pokrovsk.

Pokrovsk is a key transportation hub. If it falls, then Russian forces will cut off one of the main supply routes in the region. This will likely force Ukraine to retreat from Chasiv Yar and the front line will move closer to Kramatorsk.

The Iranian short range missile deliveries will aid the Russian advance, Mr Blinken said, by allowing Moscow to use more of its existing arsenal for targets that are further from the frontline, while reserving the new missiles for closer range targets.

Harris and Trump to debate in pivotal campaign test

Presidential debates matter in American politics. And the one that takes place on Tuesday night between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris – their only currently scheduled face-off – may matter more than most.

Joe Biden’s poor performance in the first presidential debate in late June created a firestorm of pressure within the Democratic Party that ultimately forced him to abandon his re-election campaign.

Even though Kamala Harris has been vice-president for more than three years and a candidate for president for seven weeks, she is still a relative unknown for many Americans. In a recent New York Times survey, 28% of likely November voters said that they needed to know more about the Californian.

That poll showed the race a statistical dead heat – a finding most recent surveys have also indicated, both nationally and in key battleground states. The 2024 presidential campaign has been full of historic tumult, but the American electorate is still sharply – and narrowly – divided.

That underscores the importance of Tuesday night’s debate, where even small shifts in the mood of the electorate could be the difference between victory and defeat for the candidates.

For Ms Harris, the showdown in Philadelphia provides an opportunity for her to flesh out the details before an audience of tens of millions – although she will have to do so while under rhetorical fire from her Republican opponent.

This opportunity is not without risks, however, as Ms Harris could define herself – and her positions – in ways that damage her electoral prospects. She has struggled in the past with answering pointed questions under pressure, and her reluctance to sit for media interviews in the opening weeks of her campaign has denied her the opportunity to hone her linguistic chops.

Although she has tried to present herself as the change candidate in this election, the moderators – and the former president – are likely to press her to defend the Biden administration’s record, particularly on areas where polls show Democrats are weak, such as border security and inflation.

She will also have to explain why she has renounced some of the more liberal policies she embraced during her unsuccessful bid for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination. She recently has walked back her positions on a fracking ban, decriminalising border crossing and nationalising health insurance, among others.

She has explained these changes as ones made to reflect new circumstances – but they may be viewed by some voters as moves born of political expediency.

For Trump, the debate presents an opportunity to wrest back the initiative in this campaign after a month where the Democrats – with their new nominee and high-energy convention – dominated political headlines. He has a history of thriving in the spotlight and setting the terms of political conversation that keeps his opponents off-balance and his issues – notably on immigration and trade, where his positions have broad popular support – at the forefront of political discussion.

The former president has his own potential pitfalls on Tuesday, however. His uneven performance during his June debate with Mr Biden drew little scrutiny because of his opponent’s sometimes catastrophic verbal miscues. Ms Harris is sure to present a more nimble opponent, and his answers will have to be sharper.

During a New York economic forum last week, he was unable to offer a clear explanation for his childcare policies. Such verbal meandering during the debate will provide Democrats with a wealth of campaign fodder.

Trump must also tread carefully when sparring with the vice-president – only the second woman presidential nominee and the first of colour. If he comes across as domineering or belittling, he could further damage his already weak support among female voters.

The two candidates have used markedly different ways of preparing for Tuesday night’s event. The vice-president – and former prosecutor – has been in Pittsburgh, a few hours’ drive west of Philadelphia, holding mock debates and reviewing her policy proposals. The move also allowed her to campaign and benefit from some local media coverage in the largest and most crucial battleground state of Pennsylvania.

Trump – who has participated in presidential debates in each of the past three elections – has held more informal sessions, including reviewing his positions on key issues. Last week, he participated in a town hall forum hosted by conservative cable network Fox News.

Tuesday, then, is set to be a contrast of styles as well as political views.

Although election day won’t arrive until November, early voting is set to begin this month in some key battleground states – including in pivotal Pennsylvania.

So while this debate could help set the political environment for the last two months of the 2024 presidential race, it also will be the last chance for the two candidates to reach some voters in states where every ballot matters.

Newsletter image

North America correspondent Anthony Zurcher makes sense of the race for the White House in his weekly US Election Unspun newsletter. Readers in the UK can sign up here. Those outside the UK can sign up here.